Diplomatt wrote:Standing under a tree can be classed as being covered by trees. You also contradicted yourself, 'protect or conceal it, Conceal not anything else', you ignore that his units were protected by the trees hmm?
The units are at least partially in the trees, some of them have the majority of the unit in the trees, vision and planning out an attack is irrelevant, being in trees is relevant. I have provided screenshots proving my point.
happysouls wrote:AK why are you acting as if it's not a big deal that Stradomski forest camped. I have a strange feeling after our game, that you too would be accusing him of breaking/abusing the rules if that happend to you.
Remember when I had to move out of my advantageous (most likely game winning) position, and let you charge me in the rear, during our game (which lasted 1 hour as a result of this)? I had to move out coz you refused to attack me for about 15 minutes. And that wasn't even a proper forest, it was only like 3-4 trees. And the only reason why we were able to settle this between the two of us was due to me not giving a fuck about the result of the battle (I only care about playing a good game).
I'm not trying to come up with an excuse for my loss (maybe a tiny little bit?). You won 1 - 0 with a weaker faction, fair enough ggwp. It was fun (for the first 15min that is). All is good.
If me capming, with my 4-5 depleated units ,under like 4 trees made you not want to engage me (what lasted about 15 min.) why are you acting as if what Stradomski did is fine.
IMO Diplomat is right but it doesn't matter since hosts already made their decision. It's just that I was very suprised that you consider it a fair play.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest